Baby Unicorn Power!!!
by Tenshi Vielle, Fabulous Fashionista
What's the latest trend among the elite Fashionista groups of SL this week?
I'll give you a hint.
It's not bubble hemmed sleeves.
It's not scarves, nor Shai's plaid jackets.
No, no - this time we're talking unicorns. Tiny, adorable baby unicorns that you can hold and cuddle... but they come with a price.
You can only get them by having sex with an adult unicorn (although the unicorn isn't age verified) located at the bel Highland sim in a shop called Sensual Stoneworks. This week pictures of baby unicorns (and some pictures of the sexual act!) have been popping up on Snapzilla.
[WARNING: both super-cute unicorn babies - and not-safe-for-work unicorn sex after the jump -- the Editrix]

Nylon Pinkney and Toast Bard are gentle mothers to their unicorn babies
I took a short trip to Tableau, origin of this fad, to interview a few of the Unicorn baby caretakers. They were hard to find - because each of them denied having heard of such a thing.

An avatar gets nailed by the Nightmare
"I think....that unicorn love is a beautiful thing" says bystander Moisie Swindlehurst, one resident I found in tableau who was willing to talk about the fad. "...and that if you find a spicy sexy unicorn stud muffin and want to let him fill you with his magical glittering seed, that is just fantastic. And i support it. 100%"
After much digging and several dead leads, I came upon Marcelle DeCuir, famed originator of this cult by way of Snapzilla. "I was hanging out with Polyester (Partridge) one day and she had the baby, so I asked her where she got it. She pointed me towards Sensual Stoneworks, and I was shamelessly raped by a unicorn. I don't mind".

Marcelle DeCuir conceives her first unicorn prim baby
But how many tries did it take you, Marcelle? I heard the unicorn doesn't knock you up every time.
"It does it on the first try if you make sure the poseball is set to 'mounted'," says Marcelle. "That whole place is creepy."
The sexual statues are marvelously crafted at Sensual Stoneworks. One of the griffin-bugs actually reaches out to grab you if you sit on him, and he holds you in place as he rams you from behind. It's frightening, morally wrong, and yet you just can't look away for appreciation at how many hours it must have taken to get the programming just right.

be careful near the stone demon
The stone demon reached out and grabbed me without warning. I cannot say what happened next. It's just... it's too painful.
Minx Mousehold, creator of Sensual Stoneworks, says that people are now holding contests to see who can get the most prim unicorn babies in a row the "right" way. It's truly become an underground movement; one of the most demented kind. She also says that out of the statues in the shop, only the unicorn (the white horse), the nightmare (the black horse) and the spider (currently down for repairs) will give you miniatures. The Xen statue, found in the main room, will give you a cute (and hideous) little larvae to keep.

Xen grabbed me by surprise - don't make the same mistake by glancing into the gaping well!
I'd definetely put "Sensual Stoneworks" on your must-see list. However, for this fashionista reporter... she'll be sitting at home in the corner of her attic, rocking back and forth with her painful memories.






Ummmm.....
I'll pass.
Posted by: Kahni Poitier | September 04, 2007 at 10:36 PM
Thanks for the nightmares. :(
Posted by: moo Money | September 04, 2007 at 11:24 PM
Just when you think you've heard it all bizzaroo world comes knocking.
Good writing, disturbing subject, but can't deny that something like this makes for a story.
Not sure I'll have it on places to explore, but I'm sure there will be some intrigued by the whole thing. Plus now if I see a baby unicorn inworld I'll have an idea of the mothers mental health, thanks for the insider info. ;)
Posted by: Reg Baxter | September 04, 2007 at 11:48 PM
Apparently furries are capable of any depraved manipulation. I think this qualidfies as broadly offensive.
Posted by: Some Random Guy | September 05, 2007 at 12:11 AM
holy crap! oops, did i type that out loud?
Posted by: Shraud Deadlight | September 05, 2007 at 12:24 AM
Double-yoo-tee-eff. What happened to sea monkeys? We can watch them play and grow. :P
Posted by: Squee Janitor | September 05, 2007 at 01:17 AM
So you were 'given' the unicorn by a friend, but you were unable to resist the moth and the statue huh? How many hours did you spend gazing fondly into the spiders eyes hoping he'd start working eh?
*shakes her head sadly*
ps: Is this the start of a new fashionista trend of trying to out perform each other with filthy acts?
Posted by: Kitty Lalonde | September 05, 2007 at 04:59 AM
"However, for this fashionista reporter... she'll be sitting at home in the corner of her attic, rocking back and forth with her painful memories."
:0
Please tell me the memories involved watching as opposed to actually participating.
Posted by: Second Lulz Vigilante | September 05, 2007 at 05:01 AM
Morally wrong? Who's to say what kind of morals a griffin-bug has? I'd like to hear from the Griffin bug itself.
Aside from that... You can't deny having been 'taken' completely voluntary. There's always the option to TP away. You slut ;)
Posted by: noname | September 05, 2007 at 05:10 AM
@Editrix: "after the jump" does not apply to feed readers. Please update your software so that there's clickable link for MORE in the feeds, because all the photos load in feed readers, thanks.
Tenshi, did they talk dirty to you?
Posted by: JJ | September 05, 2007 at 08:59 AM
Good story. You know, I was thinking that we should script up a way for readers to get little baby Uri's. It would be our way of giving back to the community.
Posted by: Urizenus | September 05, 2007 at 10:45 AM
You're absolutely right, noname. I should have asked the Griffin about his morals.
Posted by: Tenshi Vielle | September 05, 2007 at 11:36 AM
See THIS is the kind of crazy I can deal with!
Posted by: DaveOner | September 05, 2007 at 12:24 PM
and I always thought that unicorns were only supposed to have one horn : )
Posted by: Corona | September 05, 2007 at 12:52 PM
Highly amusing im sure - but do the unicorns grow - or do they remain as baby unicorns
Posted by: Corona | September 05, 2007 at 12:54 PM
ummm...I got twins! ROFL
Posted by: TheDiva | September 05, 2007 at 12:55 PM
> "Good story. You know, I was thinking that we should script up a way for readers to get little baby Uri's. It would be our way of giving back to the community."
See, now you are just being cruel, I was having a hard enough time with spider aspect now this? I wonder if there is room in attic with Tenshi, I'm gonna need my own corner to rock in just from the mental picture of dozens of little Uri's in the world .
Posted by: Reg Baxter | September 05, 2007 at 01:33 PM
I'm waiting for the ultimate Herald mashup where there's bukkake sex with unicorn furries and the baby unicorns bringing in the kiddie porn element. Tenshi can write it, Prok can comment and it'll be everything the Herald's about in one fell swoop.
Posted by: Morgana Fillion | September 05, 2007 at 01:56 PM
well I have been there and got my baby unicorn - thought it best to do so before the narrow minded fuckwits try to get it banned
hey its just pixels people - while sexual age play might or might not encourage real life emulation
How true could that possibly be of giant insects, Griffins and unicorns - or even three headed demon dogs
Posted by: Corona | September 05, 2007 at 04:16 PM
The multiple baby unicorns are a travesty - unicorns don't go for non-virgins, so clearly this situation is corrupting them. It shouldn't be possible to go back for a second unicorn lovechild without getting kicked to the curb.
Can we know for sure that this sort of virtual activity won't lead to the corruption of real life unicorns too??
Posted by: Morgana Fillion | September 05, 2007 at 05:18 PM
@Corona
Nobody's talking about this encourage RL emulation or getting it banned. Most of us are simply saying that this whole idea came from the diseased mind of a sick fuck. I don't think it's narrow minded to call a spade a spade.
Posted by: Second Lulz Vigilante | September 05, 2007 at 05:49 PM
Everyone:
It's just really funny.
Posted by: Moisie Swindlehurst | September 05, 2007 at 06:23 PM
"hey its just pixels people - while sexual age play might or might not encourage real life emulation
How true could that possibly be of giant insects, Griffins and unicorns - or even three headed demon dogs "
you are all hypocrites. btw sexual ageplay has nothing to do with rl pedophilia but since youre thinking that way then ok . . this whole article is about beastiality and you may start horse Fu**** in rl because of this. i think you should all be banned.
you cant have it both ways which is it? stop being hypocrites
Posted by: greta garbo | September 05, 2007 at 06:32 PM
I knew this would happen.
Ever since the unicorns started drinking from The Well of Enlightenment, the magical rainbow power has become less meaningful to them and they started hanging out with Dwarves and Halflings. When Elric the Indefatigable heard about this forbidden union, the Council of Orbs was held in Rainbow Crystal City, JubJub, the elder member of the unicorn Clan Claddish was exposed as being not of Scottish origin, but actually Polish, or perhaps Serbian. This resulted in a major dispute through the Leprechaun community, which was the beginning of the Glenfiddich Trials - dividing the Scottish and Irish Leprechauns into two separate lynch mobs.
By the time the news reached the Elfen glade of ElfenGlade, the Leprechaun wars had already escalated into all out genocide. The call went out for all Unicorn babies to train from birth to become warriors skilled in the art of impaling Scottish Leprechauns. Fluto, the commander of the Irish Leprechaun death squads, neglected his moral responsibilities and fell madly in love with his Unicorn steed, Stan.
During the Battle of HappyGrove, Stan was tragically killed by a rogue Unicorn named HoneyBrite. This infuriated Fluto to the point where he ordered the public execution of all Unicorns with the word "Brite" in their names.
It was after this awful event that a stranger appeared. He was dressed in blue and white and when he arrived in HappyGrove, all were intrigued by the spectacle of this mysterious new visitor. He stood among us and started chanting; "boom chika wow-wow, boom chicka wow-wow..." and we all joined in! These odd sounding words, and the strange gyrations of his pelvis had us mesmerized. We were frozen in place, there was nothing we could do. He raped every member of the audience, Elves, Leprechauns, and Unicorns alike - then left as mysteriously as he came.
It was only a matter of time before the Fantasy Realms sought revenge on his deviant act. This looks like the first of a grand wave of despicable acts upon humans by fantasy creatures. Expect more retaliation, much more. As for me, well, I'm now retired. I'll spend the rest of my twilight days eating magical mushrooms and blowing bubbles out my ass in lily fields. Don't come crying to me when you find out that your brand new bastard Unicorn baby contains lead paint or has small detachable parts that may be swallowed.
Posted by: Peter the WoodNymph | September 05, 2007 at 07:09 PM
@greta garbo
"btw sexual ageplay has nothing to do with rl pedophilia"
Um, yes it does. Sexual ageplay on SL is a way of acting out pedophiliac urges. They have the urges in RL. Then they come to SL to act them out. More than any other group, the sexual ageplayers should get the fuck off of SL and seek psychiatric help.
Or just kill themselves. Either way works for me.
Posted by: Second Lulz Vigilante | September 05, 2007 at 07:14 PM
"you are all hypocrites. btw sexual ageplay has nothing to do with rl pedophilia but since youre thinking that way then ok . . this whole article is about beastiality and you may start horse Fu**** in rl because of this. i think you should all be banned."
Hi Greta! Wow, you have some pretty nifty ideas about all this. =)
Report me first, please!
Posted by: Moisie Swindlehurst | September 05, 2007 at 08:15 PM
I'm a Domme, and i've had some pretty hairy experiences both real life, and in SL, But there are STILL some things i am happier just Not Knowing.
I think this is one of them.
Maria.
Posted by: Maria Leveaux | September 05, 2007 at 08:28 PM
Thank you all for your opinions. And I'm glad you're all amused by this. I know I am. Never thought that it would get THIS much attention.
As to being a 'sick fuck', I'm actually a very healthy fuck. I don't have a lot of the repressions that most have, and am not interested in blood, gore, torture, snuff, death, or wanton cruelty. And for the record, nope. I don't allow child avatars in my areas. Well, if I can catch them. No built in thing for that.
Is that a double standard? Perhaps, but I have a rule: If it makes me ill thinking about it, it's not allowed on my land. Works wonders for my happiness.
As to the rest, no animals were hurt in the making of these toys. So keep that in mind when you see a movie where animals and people get killed, but that's okay because it didn't really happen.
BuhBye!
Posted by: Merry Mousehold | September 05, 2007 at 09:27 PM
"Is that a double standard? Perhaps"
horse f***ers yah you are hee haw laugh it up buckos you all molest animals AND youre the biggest hypocrites i ever saw in my life *smirks
Posted by: greta Garbo | September 06, 2007 at 01:41 AM
Yes, blame the furries.
Do you see a single one in any of those pictures?
I thought 18 and older were allowed to play? I see a lot of childlike bickering and name calling. If you don't like it, you're free to say so, but you it's shallow to use this as some sort of soap box.
It's okay to be Gorean, it's okay to like snuff, it's okay to wallow in urine and crap..
but for some reason -this- bothers some of you?
I find stupid broadly offensive...
and yet there are still so many of them on the grid.
I've yet to do anything like this myself, but it takes a rather creative mind to do something that isn't being a tanned blond with quadruple z breasts bowing down to some man while wearing nothing but a smile emoter.
As for Age Play, I no longer even talk about the issue, it's moot. If they're caught, they'll be dealt with. But before you wave the anti age play banner high, read over what really happened...
they were actually banned for the pictures of -real- children that were found in their inventories.
I highly doubt anyone is going to glue a horn to a horse and drink it dry.
I stand firmly by non role players zipping a lip on role play issues, because you use the game as an over glorified dating service doesn't mean that the rest of us do. To each their own, now you may go back to your regularly scheduled program.
Posted by: 7 | September 06, 2007 at 02:05 AM
Just wondering...
Merrry Mousehold, are you a furry, as was suggested in above comments?
I can understand why people would jump to that conclusion, but IMHO, unicorns aren't something furry specific. The one horned bastards have been around far longer then that.
Important? No. But I am curious.
Posted by: just wondering | September 06, 2007 at 04:35 AM
"horse f***ers yah you are hee haw laugh it up buckos you all molest animals AND youre the biggest hypocrites i ever saw in my life *smirks*"
Hmm. I see a horse molesting human AV's in these pictures, but I dont see anyone molesting animals. Maybe there's one picture more in this article that isn't showing for me?
Posted by: ? | September 06, 2007 at 07:55 AM
ohhh WHATEVER you can clearly see that girl bent over taking a huge horse member up her yahoo but no thats not beastiality . . just like lil fairies arent ageplay . . ok yah sure slap a horn on it and somehow its mystical slap some wings on that child avatar and it should all be fair game to right? also moreover thats complete bullshit to lump in all sexual ageplay with those freaks passing rl child porn. and btw! the people who practice beastiality in sl do have rl pictures of animals in those situations. ive had people try to pass them to me even tho im not interested what so ever. This is a complete crock of sh** and ya know what im not afraid to say so. Im playing devils advocate because i really think you people need to wake the hell up and stop being such huge hypocrites . . i really cant stant it. Personally i dont give a flying f what you do with horse co** or child avatars or whatever do whatever the hell you want. Just know you arent fooling anybody at all by drawing lines and saying one thing is ok and one thing isnt. Either it is or it isnt and it goes the same for one thing as for the rest. Any time you try to make distinction you make fools of yourselves. Its not more morally right to do this then ageplay, dolcett or anything else. you know what it is tho? pixels, stupid.
Posted by: greta garbo | September 06, 2007 at 08:12 AM
Nope. Not a furry. Nothing against them, and they're welcome, but I'm just 'me', which is to say, whatever I feel like at the time.
Though, I do find it funny they assumed I was one, myself. Guess it just goes to show that bigots are alive and well in SL!
Posted by: Merry Mousehold | September 06, 2007 at 08:14 AM
Ya know, the only sick fucks I see here, are the people commenting how sick and twisted this all is, and how it should be banned and what not.
Either all of them are incapable of making the distinction between reality and fantasy, and let's face it, those are the really dangerous people who should be locked away in RL,
or they're measuring with double standards.
Ever played games like Grand Theft Auto or any other games where the main objective is to kill people, animals, or aliens or whatever? If the answer is yes, then, by your standards, you yourself should be locked away as well, as obviously you're having fantasies about killing people, and will bring that into reality sooner or later. After all, if someone who likes being taken by a unicorn in a game, is going to rape animals sooner or later, too.
The rest of us, who do realize that there's an enourmous difference between reality and fantasy, and keep that in mind with everything encountered, will just shrug this off as "Not my thing but whatever" and move on.
Of course, you can have the opinion that someone must be off their rocks for finding unicorn rape fun, just as much as I can have the opinion that if you think someone does things in RL that they do in SL as well, you're a fucking retard.
Now, if anyone, ANYONE can show me scientific proof that fantasy in videogames brings people to do those things in reality, I'll be more then happy to admit I'm wrong about this. Untill then, please, use your fucking brains for once. THIS IS ALL JUST AS REAL AS ANY OTHER VIDEOGAME.
Posted by: Reality Check | September 06, 2007 at 08:15 AM
Bestiality is illegal in America. Shit's sick.
Posted by: Lulzcubez | September 06, 2007 at 11:03 AM
Gee, is it?
As far as I know, so is murder. But hey, you prolly won't let that stop you from playing Grand Theft Auto, right?
Posted by: Reality Check | September 06, 2007 at 12:15 PM
if bestiality is illegal in America - how was it possible for that American man to legally marry his horse in first life
Posted by: Corona | September 06, 2007 at 12:18 PM
@Merry Mousehold
Thanks, I had that suspicion already, thanks for helping me prove my point. :)
We got only a few major groups in SL, it seems:
Furries,
Goreans,
Vampires,
Merepeople,
Trekkies,
People,
and of course, the biggest group of them all, bigots.
Which of the last group, alot have shown in these comments that they belong to.
Posted by: Just wondering | September 06, 2007 at 12:21 PM
'Re
"As for me, well, I'm now retired. I'll spend the rest of my twilight days eating magical mushrooms"
your posting possibly suggests you are already partaking natural substances
Posted by: Corona | September 06, 2007 at 12:24 PM
This is a very curious arguement :
"Either it is or it isnt and it goes the same for one thing as for the rest. Any time you try -
to make distinction
you make fools of yourselves."
What then is a legal age of consent for sex (in RL) if not a distinction?
are you saying that people should not make a distintion between underage sex and legal age sex.
or between gay sex and hetero sex - or any other distinction that might be made
are you saying that every time the government makes laws about such things they make themselves look like fools
Posted by: Corona | September 06, 2007 at 12:39 PM
Tsk. This was a funny piece, not meant to start a flame war. Knock it off.
Posted by: Tenshi Vielle | September 06, 2007 at 12:54 PM
"As to being a 'sick fuck', I'm actually a very healthy fuck. "
Best comment ever.
Posted by: Elle Maxim | September 06, 2007 at 02:51 PM
Wooooooow, between the automatic assumption that this was furry related within the first few posts and then the ensueing war about whats morally right and morally wrong in a Fantasy world. I think some people need to settle down and breath, perhaps, ironically, get off their high horse and take a step back. SL works the same way as RL, you can't go to your neighbors house and tell them what you can and can't do and just because you can't see something, doesn't mean it's not there. I have to go with Corona on this. Calm down, geez.
Posted by: Mythology Doesburg | September 06, 2007 at 03:32 PM
"Tsk. This was a funny piece, not meant to start a flame war. Knock it off."
I KNO RITE.
=/
Posted by: Moisie Swindlehurst | September 06, 2007 at 03:50 PM
The difference between Grand Theft Auto (or any average FPS) and this is that GTA is not a "substitute" for real-life ("i can't murder someone in real life so I'll go murder someone in a game"), but this IS. Reality Check, you're confusing SL -> RL ("i did something virtually which does/does not mean I'll do it IRL") with RL -> SL ("i want to do X, but I cannot in real life, therefore I'll do something virtually") which is the more apt analogy in this case.
You can play the "IT'S JUST FANTASY OKAY" card all you want, but by the end of the day you're still fapping to getting raped by an animal. :D
Posted by: mootykips | September 06, 2007 at 04:44 PM
@Just Wondering
"and of course, the biggest group of them all, bigots."
Translation=DON'T MAKE VALUE JUDGMENTS BASED ON PERSONAL BEHAVIOR!!! EVARRRRRR!!!111!!!
God, you politicaly correct types are just as bad in your own way as that wacko Fred Phelps.
@Merry Mousehold
"I don't have a lot of the repressions that most have, and am not interested in blood, gore, torture, snuff, death, or wanton cruelty."
I love the way people like you always try to use the term "repressed" as a euphemism for "inclined toward normal behavior". And I call bullshit on this not being interested in blood and gore thing you say you have no interest in. Nobody can resist taking a peek at a traffic accident even though they know they could be horrified by it. Humans are innately curious about death to one degree or another because we're all aware on some level that we'll wind up dead sooner or later.
Not that it excuses Dolcett or some of the other stuff that ties sex, death, and sadism together. All that shit deserves to be criticized too.
Sorry PC types reading this but there is a definite distinction between healthy fantasies and unhealthy ones.
Posted by: Second Lulz Vigilante | September 06, 2007 at 05:32 PM
mootykips says: "The difference between Grand Theft Auto (or any average FPS) and this is that GTA is not a "substitute" for real-life ("i can't murder someone in real life so I'll go murder someone in a game"), but this IS. Reality Check, you're confusing SL -> RL ("i did something virtually which does/does not mean I'll do it IRL") with RL -> SL ("i want to do X, but I cannot in real life, therefore I'll do something virtually") which is the more apt analogy in this case."
Mooty, has your brain rolled out of your ear? That is the lamest distinction I've seen in 4 years of Herald comment spew.
Posted by: Urizenus | September 06, 2007 at 06:59 PM
There's a huge distinction, and I would imagine it would be easier for my brain to be pulled out through my nasal sinuses instead.
There are two parts to any action - the desire to do X, and the action X. In GTA, you're killing virtual "people", but the goal has absolutely nothing to do with going out and murdering people in real life because while the action is similar (both going around and shooting "people") the desires are completely different (killing virtual people vs. killing real people). The average player hopefully sees the difference (people like Hillary Clinton and Jack Thompson argue that they can't). In this example, however, both the action and the desire are the same. Someone with a bestiality fetish is not going to keep that fetish on the Internets, it also applies IRL. The desire and the action is completely the same on both fronts, and that's exactly why the GTA analogy is null and void.
Posted by: mootykips | September 06, 2007 at 07:21 PM
Mooty we all do lots of things in second life that we wouldn't want to do in real life. Here are some examples:
Shoot people (as we do in combat sims)
Be a sumo wrestler
Be a topless dancer
Be a newspaper reporter
Get reamed by a unicorn, give birth to a baby unicorn (watch that horn) and then raise it or at least carry it around all day.
I thought you were the guy who always said SL was a game. Did you forget your mantra?
I don't think SL is *only* a game, but there *are* games in second life. Some of them involve shooting people, and some of them involve baby unicorns. Trust me, people aren't here because of frustrated unicorn raising desires. They just find the idea funny and fun. You should too.
Posted by: Urizenus | September 06, 2007 at 07:31 PM
Yet another story proving that when it comes to depravity, 21st century society knows no limits.
Posted by: Blinders Off | September 06, 2007 at 07:34 PM
I just want to say, I DO feel you're all welcome to your opinion. Mind you, I don't care about your's anymore than you care about mine, but hey, You're welcome to have one and tell anybody who will listen about it. Heck, Even I'LL listen, if I'm bored enough.
But I really don't care. You see, My limits are MINE. What I see as sick is MY OPINION. As to "It's only pixels/it's sick/it's a furry conspiracy/normal/scary/OMFG!"... Well, there you go. NOBODY agrees about anything.
And for the record, beastiality has to be less sick than child sex. Look at it this way, do you find slaughtering cows for food as nasty as using babies for the same thing? (And yes, that's a loaded question.)
Buhbye!
Posted by: Merry Mousehold | September 06, 2007 at 07:41 PM
Tenshi Vielle your right this is a funny story :). and the posts get funnier the farther it goes . Oh if you wonder.. I am not a Furry either and I was the one who actually Made those baby Unicorns. I hope everyone is enjoying them as much as I am enjoying watching people run in circles screaming about them.
Posted by: Minx Mousehold | September 06, 2007 at 07:55 PM
Okay... that is pretty gross.
Posted by: RandomNumber Generator | September 06, 2007 at 08:53 PM
@urizenus
"Some of them involve shooting people, and some of them involve baby unicorns. Trust me, people aren't here because of frustrated unicorn raising desires."
Still not the same thing. I play shooter games sometimes. But this doesn't entail a fantasy of shooting people in RL. So why do I do it? I DO have a fantasy about walking up to my RL bosses and telling them what a bunch of fat wothless shit-humping bastards they are. But that's a bad idea so I channel that anger into shooting moving blobs of pixels instead of insulting my bosses.
Porn shit is different. I used to hide copies of Penthouse under my bed as a teenager. Sometimes I'd pull them out, look at the nekkid women, and get a good jerk going. Would I have fucked those women in RL given the oppourtunity? Absolutely.
And as Mootykips said, "You can play the "IT'S JUST FANTASY OKAY" card all you want, but by the end of the day you're still fapping to getting raped by an animal. :D"
He's quite correct.
@Minx Mousehold
"And for the record, beastiality has to be less sick than child sex."
Agreed. If knew some ageplayer was eyeing one of my kids IRL, I'd bust him in his fucking mouth. If some Dolcett freak or Gorean was eyeing my wife, I'd also bust him in his fucking lips. But if some bestiality fetishist was eyeing my dog, I'd merely tell him that he was a sick fuck and to stay out of my yard or I'd call the cops.
So if you're saying there a different levels of psychosexual sickness, I'd have to agree.
"Look at it this way, do you find slaughtering cows for food as nasty as using babies for the same thing?"
This doesn't concern slaughtering cows for food. This concerns people wanting to have sex with equines.
Posted by: Second Lulz Vigilante | September 06, 2007 at 09:17 PM
hmms.. If your going to rant.. aim it at the right person....
@Minx Mousehold
"And for the record, beastiality has to be less sick than child sex."
not my quote
Posted by: Minx Mousehold | September 06, 2007 at 11:06 PM
"If knew some ageplayer was eyeing one of my kids IRL, I'd bust him in his fucking mouth. If some Dolcett freak or Gorean was eyeing my wife, I'd also bust him in his fucking lips."
Yeah, let's get preached to about morality from a guy whose first reaction to suspicions about what other people are thinking is to "bust them in the mouth". Yes! Violence from the morality preacher! First line of action! Not talking to the person, you know, asking about their intentions, but pre-emptively "busting them in the mouth" (which I doubt you could or would actually do - it's quite likely that you're a scrawny, pencil-neck pussy in RL who talks like the BMOC when he gets his Doritos stained fingers on the keys).
You just contradicted your own rather moronic argument about the difference between GTA and porn. Moron. Don't become a writer - you suck at it.
You and all these other lulzkids who speak as if they just discovered what their genitals were for yesterday -- I laugh at you and feel pity for you - thinking you've got life all figured out - and at such a tender age!
PLZ GIVV US UR NUGENTZ OF WIZDOM! NEVER TEH STOPZ KK?
Have another Dew kiddo!
Posted by: Yorba the Geek | September 07, 2007 at 02:34 AM
@Yorba the Geek
I knew I'd out at least one ageplayer with that comment Yorba. Stay away from my kids IRL or I'll bust you in your fucking lips plzkthx.
"You just contradicted your own rather moronic argument about the difference between GTA and porn."
No I didn't. I merely stated a fact...that you guys are probably eyeing up people's kids in RL. This is what makes people hate you so much. If we catch you looking our kids up and down in a lewd manner be prepared to swallow a few of your own teeth. Doesn't mean I enjoy RL violence dumbass. But even when violence isn't enjoyed that doesn't stop it from being necessary sometimes.
Posted by: Second Lulz Vigilante | September 07, 2007 at 08:26 AM
@Minx Mousehold
Oops! Sorry about that, Minx. There seems to be two people with the name of Mousehold in this thread and I got you mixed up with Merry Mousehold.
Posted by: Second Lulz Vigilante | September 07, 2007 at 08:30 AM
Minx, you have a fantastic imagination! Just beautiful! What fun, this is what SecondLife is all about!
Posted by: Myrtyl Mertel | September 07, 2007 at 09:22 AM
"beastiality has to be less sick than child sex"
it really says alot about you that you even make that distinction. fyi smart ones in real life both of these things are illegal . . at least where i come from . . and in sl it cant be illegal because it isnt fucking REAL. and child porn would be an entirely different topic because it involves the exploitation of real life children. what is wrong with you people that you cant understand simple fucking concepts like REALITY vs fantasy. and not even sick pedo fantasy like what is suggested but actually bdsm fantasy which you probably dont understand because you are to square and reactionary to comtemplate anything in depth. As far as im concerned anyone complaining about what other grown ups do with their pixels are out of their god damn minds and need help to distinguish what is real. You are scary people. And im really glad i stirred the pot. i hope it takes you a long time to wash the stink off. assholes
Posted by: greta garbo | September 07, 2007 at 10:39 AM
Well, well.
From unicorn sex it developed in a couple of chan nerds treatening with violence in case their kids get looked at strangely.
Ya know, the funny part of this all, is, if you look at where these 'lulz' people come from, 7 chan among others, which features the /cake/ Loli board.
Now, everyone here might be familiar with the term lolicon, or lolita.
Yup. It's a board filled with child porn. Drawn of course, but still.
So I hope that mister secondluz here will make sure to punch out anyone's teeth who even thinks of looking at his children. Can't have strangers raping them too, of course. Only daddy is allowed to do that.
Now, we sit back and watch how people start crying that this all isn't true. Of course, you can check 7chan.org, and see for yourself. Protip: don't enter the loli board at work. seriously.
Posted by: ge-lulz | September 07, 2007 at 10:51 AM
It's hilarious how outraged people can become over the movement of pixels. I thought this was immensly funny, especially the "OMG THINK OF TEH CHILDREN" responses. Lol.
Great article, Tenshi!
Posted by: Mike | September 07, 2007 at 02:34 PM
Furthering Greta Garbo's Comment:
Don't forget to check http://www.4chan.org as well.
Not only do they have various boards, from /s/ for "Sexy Beautiful Women Porn" to /ic/ for "Yaoi Male on Male Anime Porn" to /d/ for "Hentai Anime Porn" they have the /b/ Random board as well. For regular goers, common is the joke acout "CP" which is child porn. It is commonly posted, then eventually removed after a moderator sees it. It's all a big joke there, so if they're coming here ranting about screwing unicorns,they are just coming here to "trool" this board to see what kind of comments they can generate. It's a 4chan thing to come to other places to do this. They LOVE infiltrating other people's boards.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 07, 2007 at 03:04 PM
@ge-lulz
"Ya know, the funny part of this all, is, if you look at where these 'lulz' people come from, 7 chan among others, which features the /cake/ Loli board."
I'm not a channer. Sorry but not everyone who criticizes this stuff comes from the chans. Thanks for putting out a false dichotomy.
"So I hope that mister secondluz here will make sure to punch out anyone's teeth who even thinks of looking at his children."
Yep. That's wht I'm going to do if somebody stares at my kids in a lewd manner. Hate to tell you this but a ton of other parents are also protective of their kids and would probably do the same.
"Can't have strangers raping them too, of course."
Can't have anybody raping them. Which is why a lot of us hate ageplayers so much. We're afraid that at least a few of you might do upon losing that last little shred of self control. Hell a few of you have already started crossing that line by smuggling kiddy porn onto the grid.
"Only daddy is allowed to do that."
You agplayers always do this. When somebody says something bad about your "fetish"(i.e. psychosexual problem) you try and project your pedophelia off onto your critics. Desperate strawman argument, at the very least.
"Now, we sit back and watch how people start crying that this all isn't true. Of course, you can check 7chan.org, and see for yourself. Protip: don't enter the loli board at work. seriously."
No doubt that the chans could probably use a good housecleaning too. But this doesn't excuse the SL ageplayers anymore than it excuses any other net pedophiles. Personally I'd like to see you ageplayers driven off the net completely but that's probably wishful thinking on my part because you've got too many places to hide already.
Anyway, stay away from our kids in RL, Skippy.
@greta garbo
"fyi smart ones in real life both of these things are illegal . . at least where i come from . . and in sl it cant be illegal because it isnt fucking REAL."
Yes both are illegal but different crimes get different priorities. Just ask any law enforcement officer in RL. And LL CAN ban ageplay or whatever they want. It's their platform after all.
"You are scary people. And im really glad i stirred the pot. i hope it takes you a long time to wash the stink off. assholes"
Yeah because criticising a behavior is scary stuff. lol! I guess you also find free speech scary as well. Am I correct?
Posted by: Second Lulz Vigilante | September 07, 2007 at 03:12 PM
Whine whine whine bitch complain whine whine.
Seriously, people, shut the hell up.
If you like being reamed by a unicorn, by all means go there and get reamed by one.
If you don't, no one is forcing you to go to this sim. Continue with your lives and stop finding stuff to complain about. If you MUST find something to complain about, at least make it something *worthwhile*.
Thank you, have a nice day.
Posted by: Zorin Frobozz | September 07, 2007 at 03:22 PM
Wewt!! Thanks Mike!! :)
Posted by: Tenshi Vielle | September 07, 2007 at 07:30 PM
Well, I have one thing to say about all this:
I can hardly wait until someone comes up with some competition for Linden Lab. I will greatly enjoy the mass-exodus that follows. :D
I just hope the competition has the good sense to moderate some of the garbage that goes on with Second Life. I am so tired of garbage-dump sims and running into multiple "security" blockers I could scream. I never visit the main continents any more and have no desire to. I fervently hope someone comes along and does a better job. They can certainly do it for far less money than LL is charging. There is no reason why a sim shouldn't cost $95 a month instead of $295. Linden Lab is in serious need of some serious competition.
Posted by: Blinders off | September 07, 2007 at 08:00 PM
Oh, and to Zorbin Frobozz....
Whine whine whine complain whine whine.
Seriously, Zorbin, shut the @#** up.
If you don't like hearing people voice their honest opinions, go read your comic books or watch your likely significant collection of porn DVDs.
No one is forcing you to read this zine. Continue with your life and stop finding stuff to complain about. If you MUST find something to complain about, at least make it something *worthwhile*.
Other people have as much right to voice their opinions as you do... and frankly, their opinions are probably a lot more intelligent. It's always hilarious how some dweeble thinks he is soooo much more mature than others, to the point that he can tell them what they can and can't post in a blog. LOL. Poor baby.
Thank you, have a nice day.
Posted by: Blinders Off | September 07, 2007 at 08:03 PM
I'd like to adress the comments of ageplay = paedophilia.
I am female.
I am over the age of 21.
I'm an ageplayer.
NO. I am not interested in having sex with children. I am not interested in looking at children. I don't have children.
NO. I don't believe in incest. NO, I do NOT want to have sex with my father.
I am in a real life ageplay relationship that consists of myself, and my "Daddy." However, "Daddy" is an address of respect. We do NOT roleplay that I am his daughter.
Our relationship is based on trust and respect. He takes care of me, and THAT is the "Daddy" part.
So, NO. Every single ageplayer that is out there does NOT want to have sex with your child. Not all of us are like that.
Posted by: AgePlayer | September 07, 2007 at 08:37 PM
@AgePlayer
Hey, if you're talking about non-sexual ageplay where the kid av flies kites and kicks beachballs around, that's no big deal. Knock yourself out.
But the sexual ageplayers are obviously pedos.
Posted by: Second Lulz Vigilante | September 07, 2007 at 09:13 PM
As someone who has no SL (and barely a FL) I came to this through Boing^2 and find it most entertaining.
As to the idea that doing things in SL will lead to doing them in RL, consider this idea from the book "Freakonomics": The reduction in the number of rapes happened at the same time that pornography became very readily available. Perhaps being able to read about a fantasy reduces the need to act out the fantasy.
The effect of being able to digitally act out the fantasy is something I do not know enough to evaluate.
And then, there is "teledildonics".
Posted by: mjc | September 07, 2007 at 09:44 PM
If you kids don't knock it off I'll turn these comments around!! /me shakes fist
Posted by: Tenshi Vielle | September 08, 2007 at 12:15 AM
Wow. This is almost reminiscent of something many of us have been thinking about since we first saw Bachelor Party on beta at our parent's houses when we were twelve. At least we don't have to to Tijuana...
Posted by: Nikola Shirakawa | September 08, 2007 at 06:21 AM
Reading all this makes me so happy, because it reminds me that there are people in the world I can comfortably say have even less of a life than me. For fuck's sake, people, you're arguing about fake digital sex with a fake digital unicorn in a fake digital world. There are far more important things to be concerned about. Get off the internet, it clearly isn't for you.
Posted by: asdfghjkl | September 08, 2007 at 07:13 AM
SL is beyond total suckage, it is a slow crappy time sink, with no redeeming values.
Most worthless waste of 2 hours to check it out. Don't waste your time. SL is not worth checking out. Move on Folks , nothing to see here.
Posted by: Fred REd | September 08, 2007 at 09:37 AM
@Fred REd
"SL is beyond total suckage, it is a slow crappy time sink, with no redeeming values."
You've not only described SL. You've also described 95% of the rest of the internet. :p
Posted by: Second Lulz Vigilante | September 08, 2007 at 10:08 AM
Haha, oh wow. That's a long ways to go in pursuit of porno.
Posted by: D | September 08, 2007 at 10:34 AM
Wow. That's awesome.
Posted by: Anon | September 08, 2007 at 10:46 AM
I have to say this is very arousing. Sorry if you didnt mean for it to be, i'm not trying to offend.
Nice imagination to pull this off. I guess thats the beauty of a world with limitless possibilities.
Now if only i could find the place. Is it female only?
Posted by: alukard | September 08, 2007 at 02:08 PM
HAHAHAHA Imagine being IBM or Mercedes Benz etc.. and seeing this.
Investing so much money into a platform which is full of nutters with severe mental problems.
I'm sure this is exactly what LL dreamed of when they created the metaverse
Posted by: lol-Im-in-PN | September 08, 2007 at 02:37 PM
shouldn't you censor that screenshot regardless of the lack of detail on that horse penis entering the clothed woman's rear end?
Posted by: crithon | September 08, 2007 at 03:16 PM
fuck ibm and fuck mercedes benz - this is what the inside of our minds look like as human beings - ARE YOU SCARED? SCARY STUFF HUH? you big baby go suck your thumb - i also wonder if Philip had any clue but from what ive read about it him doesnt know what hes doing anyway. Hes trying to make his virtual platform work like real life . . lol sighs . .except one thing dumb ass you cant contrain thought and dreams only physical actions and i would defy anyone to try because the platform is more like a projection screen for our inner thoughts regardless of an individuals lucidity anyway about 2 people are gonna understand what i just said so i will just say fuck one more time.
Posted by: greta garbo | September 08, 2007 at 03:43 PM
"fuck ibm and fuck mercedes benz - this is what the inside of our minds look like as human beings - ARE YOU SCARED? SCARY STUFF HUH? you big baby go suck your thumb"
LOL This might be in the minds of some human beings, but they're a small small segment of society which is virtually worthless to the corperate world (people with severe mental problems dont make much money)
These people call themselves "fashionistas" and pretend they're shopping in milan or paris, If these dillusional basement dwellers want that part of the real life experience i dont see where unicorn sex fits in.
I understand that a virtual world is a fantastic place for sick fucks to live out their bizzaro fantasies. But it should be kept as far as possible away from the public eye. Only problem is 95% of SL users are sick fucks.....
Posted by: lol-Im-in-PN | September 08, 2007 at 07:13 PM
"LOL This might be in the minds of some human beings, but they're a small small segment of society which is virtually worthless to the corperate world (people with severe mental problems dont make much money)"
Goodnight, sleepy head :)
Posted by: lol wut | September 08, 2007 at 07:53 PM
"they're a small small segment of society which is virtually worthless to the corperate world (people with severe mental problems dont make much money)"
No actually its pretty much everyone as a human race and you can tell when you think of what dreams people have when they sleep. its simply human nature to have strange thoughts or dreams or even fantasies. i doubt very much that you are qualified to diagnose mental illness anyway. Is Stephen King mentally ill then? You are an idiot if you think your argument makes sense.
"Only problem is 95% of SL users are sick fucks....."
which was my point in the first place so im not sure what you are debating
Posted by: greta garbo | September 08, 2007 at 07:55 PM
No point in getting all righteously charged over this stuff, either it's a joke or some eccentric individuals doing odd things which I guess would be expected in the realm of something like SL. Generally other MMO type things don't pose conundrums quite as disconcerting as this (and other things you all have mentioned) so it isn't a big deal. Besides people fantasizing about carnal relations with a fantasy creature are probably a very small percentage of the internet population at large..I hope. Just think how interesting user defined virtual realities will be in the future with full sensory immersion! Yikes.
Posted by: clinicalsanity | September 09, 2007 at 02:44 AM
@greta garbo
"...because the platform is more like a projection screen for our inner thoughts regardless of an individuals lucidity..."
This contradicts your earlier statement that:
"btw sexual ageplay has nothing to do with rl pedophilia"
To wit, yes it does. No matter how you try to defend sexual ageplay, those sick fucks don't suddenly lose their pedophiliac fantasies the moment they log off Second Life. Just be aware that everytime you defend sexual ageplay on the internet, your also defending the pedophile mindset.
Posted by: Second Lulz Vigilante | September 09, 2007 at 05:21 AM
Everyone has fantasies, dreams they want to chase.
mine are in a magical forest where the following takes place.
Fields of rainbows, lollipop trees and no one nears forlorn.
I can fulfill my deepest desires, and fuck a unicorn. i'm fucking a unicorn. fucking a unicorn.
It might sound gay, before a bail of hay I can feel reborn.
Close my eyes, float away and fuck a unicorn. and there's no one here to judge me, to reprimand or scorn.
No here to ask me, "john, why do you fuck this unicorn?" And i know i can't spend my life here and my heart is truly torn.
but tonight i'll feel alright i'm gonna fuck that unicorn. And then i'll bid fairwell to my stallion, a mythical creature with a horn,
and one more time before i say goodnight i'm gonna fuck that unicorn.
i'm fucking a unicorn, i'm fucking a unicorn, i'm fucking a unicorn, i'm fucking a unicorn, i'm fucking a unicorn....unicorn
Stuckey & Murray's "Unicorn in C Major"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4O_3fYlHZA
Posted by: TigroSpottystripes Katsu | September 09, 2007 at 06:39 AM
WTF is this for a game... only sick people play this... waht happend with the world???
Posted by: WTF | September 09, 2007 at 09:00 AM
http://www1.vg.no/spill/artikkel.php?artid=162208
big in norway.
Posted by: antonia marat | September 09, 2007 at 12:55 PM
LOL, thats hot, im a member wheres the location :p?
Posted by: lattis | September 09, 2007 at 03:54 PM
"I knew I'd out at least one ageplayer with that comment Yorba. Stay away from my kids IRL or I'll bust you in your fucking lips plzkthx."
RIGHT Because pointing out your hypocrisy, moronic logic, and retarded analogies = ZOMG AGEPLAYER! You prolly believe all the conspiracy theories about 9/11 too, right? Fucking paranoid, useless, piece of shit. Ruled by fear like most Americans. You try to bust me in the mouth. Hope your employer (or more likely your parents) has good health coverage. Hope there's a trauma center nearby too. You'll just prove my point about your paranoia as I have zero interest in children, and end up really sore for a couple of weeks.
NO GTA HAS NO EFFECT ON ME BUT I BUST PEOPLE IN THE MOUTH IF THEY LOOK AT MY FAMILY (which I doubt you even have, no one in their right mind would have a family with a paranoid, abusive, and suspicious little bitch like you). Yeah, not contradicting yourself at all there, shit for brains.
"No I didn't. I merely stated a fact...that you guys are probably eyeing up people's kids in RL. This is what makes people hate you so much. If we catch you looking our kids up and down in a lewd manner be prepared to swallow a few of your own teeth. Doesn't mean I enjoy RL violence dumbass. But even when violence isn't enjoyed that doesn't stop it from being necessary sometimes."
You are illogical and ruled by fear, suspicion and a bad case of an inferiority complex. Yes, break laws and preach to others about morality. Please continue. You just reinforce why society has no use for paranoid, hypocritical children-in-an-adult's-body would-be law breakers like you. People like YOU, who feel that smacking people in the mouth because of what you THINK they're thinking, should be in prison. All that will do is make you a proven criminal, who hasn't proven anything, let alone guilt of a "thought crime". Tell you what fuckface - if you like that type of world, move to a communist dictatorship. Funny thing though, it will prolly be YOU that is tried and convicted of thought crime by some other dumb asses with arrested social development.
Facts? You don't know me. So don't talk to me about "facts", asshole. All you have are suspicions, and self-loathing which you try to take out anonymously on teh inetwebs.
But yes, calling you out for your paranoid, asinine and completely hysterical assumptions and excuses makes me a pedo.
Tard.
Posted by: Yorba the Geek | September 09, 2007 at 11:33 PM
And to say a guy died in RL while being f***** up the behind by a horse.
Why am I not surprised the guy was American?
Posted by: Huahua | September 10, 2007 at 12:03 PM
yah that was by where i live - they had a farm they were using to sell animal sex - guy took a horse cock up his ass and the horse stabbed a hole in the guys ass with his cock - then the guy died because shit kept leaking into his body from the hole. Do you feel sexy now baby?
Posted by: greta garbo | September 10, 2007 at 01:07 PM
Hey, isn't the missionary position called "the American position" in Europe? So who's to lay on the Americans for the death of some guy who was doing a horse?
Posted by: Tenshi Vielle | September 10, 2007 at 02:32 PM
Jesus fucking christ. What is wrong with you people. Getting knocked up by a Unicorn ? What the hell can top that ? Getting nailed by the holy spirit ?
"want to let him fill you with his magical glittering seed,"
-Seriously. You need to get laid. Bad.
Posted by: Van Harpen | September 11, 2007 at 07:23 AM
@Yorba the Geek
"RIGHT Because pointing out your hypocrisy, moronic logic, and retarded analogies = ZOMG AGEPLAYER! You prolly believe all the conspiracy theories about 9/11 too, right? Fucking paranoid, useless, piece of shit. Ruled by fear like most Americans. You try to bust me in the mouth. Hope your employer (or more likely your parents) has good...blahblahblah...meaningless uberlib don't judge people talking points...ad nauseam"
Okay, maybe you're not a sexual ageplayer yourself. But you're still supporting them and trying to shield them. That's fucking low and despicable, even for the internet.
FACT: sexual ageplayers have pedophiliac urges AT ANY TIME. It doesn't magically end when they log off. A pedophile is a pedophile regardless of whether or not they've actually molested a child. A child molestor is nothing more than a pedophile who couldn't control the pedophile urge anymore.
FACT: Most people hate and/or fear pedophiles...at least if they're sane. Why is this? Because pedophilia is a sexual attraction TO CHILDREN.
And you're a fine one to talk about "thought crimes", Yorba ya hypocrite. Apparently, hating pedophiles qualifies as a "thought crime" in your book. lol!
Posted by: Second Lulz Vigilante | September 11, 2007 at 06:30 PM
Hi... just wanted to drop "Occam's razor" in to the mix and see where it leads. A lot of arguments are talking about crossing "that" line... but where do you draw it?
Example... Not okay for ageplay. But what age? Would it be diffrent for diffrent parts of the world where age of consent is diffrent? Would it change geographicly or held within ones own moraility? How do you judge the age of a pixle person? Sorry if there is a system in SL, I do not play... I just find this agrument interesting.
Same thing with "bestality" and sex with "unicorns" or whatever... at what point is it not an animal? In my own opinion if it wasn't born it's not an animal but then that is me, but still...
...we all make fun of that guy with the "rubber" girlfriend! ha!
Look, when I was 16 when I first got to jump the pond and ended up in Europe (no this is not a Euro or Ameri bash, sorry) and I found to my delight that I could now go out to a bar and drink! Yay... needless to say that after a couple of days of this I found that drinking really wasn't what I wanted to spend the rest of my vacation doing (or, more aptly... getting over drinking) and moved on to the really good parts of my vacation, the people.
I'd say the same of this... Hay, I can make things do all sorts of lewd things... Yay! Oh... hum... Okay, over it... what's next?
Posted by: Hellloooooo People | September 11, 2007 at 07:36 PM
I'm somewhat agreeing with 'Hellloooooo People' in this. Moral is not a standard concept, everyone is seeing the same thing from a different point of view. Some facts can't be argued with though.
So in the middle ages people got wed at 15, even 12 years old, why not now? For one, it's not physically safe to have children at such a young age, even with our modern medicine. This has nothing to do with unicorn impregnation however but I can see why people brought it up. It gives people an idea that someone is performing an act of "unhealthy" relationship. The example (exaggeration or urban.. rural legend maybe?) with the man and the horse shows, some relations aren't sane in the sense that you can get speared to death. Pixel unicorns are just funny.
Now I for one don't care if people stuff themselves with horses or avocados, whatever gets their kicks, just keep it off my backyard. If someone wants to use a game, or graphical interface to interact with a horse someone draw.. oh joy giddyup cowboy/girl, ride that pony! I don't for a minute think they would go "molest" horses who wouldn't care rats ass where they stick their yard of meat.
Fact is, computer games have become and will come more violent than before. Because they are for adults. Because they are for adults. Adults like their horror, thriller, blood and guts. It's human nature, why else would we do it? We can't change it, not overnight. The double standard of sex and violence.. why is the other accepted and the other's a mortal sin, if both are just for entertainment. There is no clear answer, people just are built that way, like we're built to eat meat and vegetables.
I would even go so far as to support this unicorn fetish. Not my cup of tea but at least I can live with the fact that someone is jerking off on their screen ogling at a horse with two poles than an image of a minor. Peace.
Posted by: Matter of opinion | September 12, 2007 at 04:21 PM
Hey... wanted to say something only because I'm a self proclaimed idiot and had a total brain fart with the "Occam's Razor" bit. Although, thinking about it now... Occam's Razor does apply...
...so, before anyone else does! I have grown a beard... and it's at a point where I need to shave it... and Occam's Razor hit my head while I was thinking of the "fallacy of the beard" or the "continuum fallacy" which would be more to my point... Razor, Beard, Shave... see where I mixed things up? Anyway...
Posted by: Hellloooooo People | September 12, 2007 at 08:36 PM
So this game is played with consenting adults... and kids whose parents have consented... i just checked the web site for SL and they DO have a SL teen world setup and I bet this [the unicorn thing] wouldn't be allowed there. (at least, I hope not... If i found this on my teens world I'd cancel my teens account)! So consenting adults... who pay for the right to play and be involved in this virtual world... are role playing with each other. That's kinda like phone sex, isn't it? Consenting adults that are play acting roles with each other and paying for the right?
Yes... children are playing. But let's face it... if you bring your child to a bar they are not going to all stop drinking, being lewd, and carrying on while you are there. Yes, some decnet folk will tighten things up if they know a childs in the room but in this case it is so very hard to know if one is or not.
So really, in my own humble opinion, it is up to the parents to make sure their kids are in a safe environment. Sign up for the teen SL world or make sure you are there to guide your teen/child and talk about their online experiences.
But on the other hand... if some jerk signs up for the teen SL and is stalking kids, then YES, he needs to be dealt with appropriately (and, again my opinion, teeth or other parts of the body should be quickly removed). That should not be tolerated.
So to sum it up... Consenting adults perv'n on pixles? Eh, not so worried about. Idiots stalking childern? Big worry!
Posted by: One Last Thought | September 12, 2007 at 08:37 PM
I'm SOOOO agreeing with 'Matter of opinion'. Nothing needs to be said more. Except for this...
Peace.
Posted by: Yaknow... he's right | September 13, 2007 at 04:27 PM
interesting, not the unicorn part but all the people on this thread, interesting. 8==========D
Posted by: happy pants | September 13, 2007 at 04:36 PM
FYI, Bestiality is *not* illegal nationwide in the US.
With as much accuracy as I can accomplish while dodging horrific and disturbing sites, as of march 2006 there was 14 states with no bestiality laws. Including Washington, where a man getting his intestines ruptured prompted state lawmakers to begin legislation on one.
Yes, it's disturbing, but as long as the animal isn't harmed (thereby making it 'animal cruelty') it's technically legal in some states.
...Now, if you'll excuse me, I have some getting horribly ill to be doing.
Posted by: A. Nony Mouse | September 14, 2007 at 03:38 PM
We are talking about pixels here... Murder is pretty much illegal everywhere in the whole world and yet we still have movies, pictures, books, magazines, poems, audio, etc... that depict grizzly death sceans in the form of entertainment. Murder... Illegal... everywhere... The whole point is that these are consenting adults that are paying to look at pixels and interact with each other! This is not even to the point of being snuff (which, at least where I come from, would then be illigal)!
Look... I think the primary word here is "consent" ...oh, and "adult." Yes! "Consenting Adults" That works nicely. By reading the EULA and paying your money and the act of loging in to the virtural world you are an adult that is consenting to interact in that world. Hate to say it but if you don't like what you see, logoff! Stop paying! Find another world!
As soon as non-consent comes in to the picture then I'll have a problem.
Doh... okay, I think he was actually posting to something waaaay above so my rant is a little of direction. Sorry! Still going to post anyway... since I typed it out and all...
Posted by: WeAreTalkingAboutPixels! | September 18, 2007 at 11:49 AM
For future reference, this area has moved. It's now in it's own sim. http://slurl.com/secondlife/Sensual%20Stoneworks/89/82/26/
--
-Kasumi Ghia-
Posted by: Kasumi Ghia | September 18, 2007 at 04:38 PM
Huh. Well I can't say that unicorn sex floats MY boat at all. But I do find this.... highly amusing. Especially coupled with legends regarding unicorns in the real world. Ever wonder why they're attracted to virgins?
Once I get done laughing my ass off I'd like to state that second life is a game. It's NOT a forum, it's NOT a single player game, but it IS very much similar, in many ways, to an MMO. So, if you can kill the Alliance, or the Orcs in WoW, why can't you do whatever floats your boat here?
Now, I'll get back to laughing. Laughing quite merrily. This is.... *snicker* I'm sorry but *Bwa* I'll never look at a unicorn the same again. *Heh*
Posted by: Le Blue Dude | September 19, 2007 at 11:11 PM
Sex with animal
you strange people LOL
Posted by: Maverick | September 20, 2007 at 12:49 PM
Why are you upset about something that YOU PERSONALLY DON'T HAVE TO DEAL WITH? if you DON'T like it, DON'T go to the sim. that's ALL there is to it. Do NOT blame someone because they find it amusing or even a turn on, it's NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS what they like. mind your own. period. No one can see what you do in your home in RL, and I bet, I just have a sneaking hunch, there are things you do, that others would find distasteful. First off, it's PIXELS, secondly, children cannot defend themselves, and children do NOT NORMALLY have sex, period. Animals do, they even screw others not of their species. if an animal doesn't want it, they have teeth, hooves and can run. What can a child do? nothing, because the adult has the power over them.
Now, as for sick? NO. I know both Minx and Merry, they have the most imagination of anyone I have seen on SL. if it wasn't for imagination where would the world be? A cold dead sterile place. Not somewhere I want to be. if you don't like it, don't look, BUT if you see it IRL, you have a choice to make, if it's a child done that way, and you don't report it/bash the hell out of the person doing it, then you are guilty of perpetuating it. If it's with an animal, take into consideration, does your state have a law against it, How did you come upon it in the first place, is it one of YOUR animals, and is the animal b